1979 Dodge Aspen vs. 1983 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1983 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Dodge Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Dodge Aspen would be higher. At 3,685 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Dodge Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mazda RX-7 (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1979 Dodge Aspen. (100 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1979 Dodge Aspen. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Dodge Aspen weights approximately 425 kg more than 1983 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Dodge Aspen (231 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1979 Dodge Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Dodge Aspen | 1983 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Aspen | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3685 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 231 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2430 mm |