1979 Dodge Mirada vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Dodge Mirada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Dodge Mirada would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 840 kg more than 1979 Dodge Mirada.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Dodge Mirada | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Dodge | Fisker |
| Model | Mirada | Karma |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3160 mm |
