1979 Dodge Omni vs. 1964 Holden EH
To start off, 1979 Dodge Omni is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,929 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Holden EH weights approximately 189 kg more than 1979 Dodge Omni.
Because 1964 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Dodge Omni | 1964 Holden EH | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Omni | EH |
Year Released | 1979 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 2929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2680 mm |