1979 Dodge Omni vs. 1982 Maserati Merak
To start off, 1982 Maserati Merak is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 1,999 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Maserati Merak is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Maserati Merak weights approximately 354 kg more than 1979 Dodge Omni.
Because 1982 Maserati Merak is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Maserati Merak. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Dodge Omni | 1982 Maserati Merak | |
| Make | Dodge | Maserati |
| Model | Omni | Merak |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 1716 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2610 mm |
