1979 Dodge Omni vs. 1989 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1989 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 618 kg more than 1979 Dodge Omni.
Because 1989 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Dodge Omni | 1989 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Omni | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1716 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 1614 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 45 L |
