1979 Dodge Omni vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 724 kg more than 1979 Dodge Omni.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Dodge Omni. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Dodge Omni | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Omni | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1716 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 55 L |
