1979 Dodge Omni vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 1,716 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Dodge Omni is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Roadster weights approximately 34 kg more than 1979 Dodge Omni.
Because 2003 Mazda Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mazda Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Dodge Omni | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Omni | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1716 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 48 L |
