1979 Dodge Omni vs. 2013 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2013 Ford Expedition is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1656 kg more than 1979 Dodge Omni.
Because 2013 Ford Expedition is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford Expedition. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Dodge Omni | 2013 Ford Expedition | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Omni | Expedition |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1716 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 306 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 2652 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5245 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2332 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1961 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3023 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 106 L |
