1979 Fiat 128 vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Fiat 128. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Fiat 128 would be higher. At 1,308 cc, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1979 Fiat 128. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1979 Fiat 128. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1979 Fiat 128. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Fiat 128, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1979 Fiat 128 has manual transmission. 1979 Fiat 128 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Fiat 128 | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | 128 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1780 mm |