1979 Fiat Mirafiori vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 1984 Lotus Etna is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Fiat Mirafiori. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Fiat Mirafiori would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 264 more horse power than 1979 Fiat Mirafiori. (67 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1979 Fiat Mirafiori.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Fiat Mirafiori. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Fiat Mirafiori.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Fiat Mirafiori | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
Make | Fiat | Lotus |
Model | Mirafiori | Etna |
Year Released | 1979 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 3946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 331 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 408 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 95.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 69.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 11.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2520 mm |