1979 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1972 Matra-Simca M670
To start off, 1979 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Matra-Simca M670. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Matra-Simca M670 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Matra-Simca M670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 (444 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 385 more horse power than 1979 Fiat Ritmo. (59 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 should accelerate faster than 1979 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 184 kg more than 1972 Matra-Simca M670.
Because 1972 Matra-Simca M670 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Matra-Simca M670. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Fiat Ritmo | 1972 Matra-Simca M670 | |
| Make | Fiat | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Ritmo | M670 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 1049 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 444 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 11000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2570 mm |
