1979 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1998 Acura CL
To start off, 1998 Acura CL is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura CL (150 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1979 Fiat Ritmo. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1979 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Acura CL weights approximately 716 kg more than 1979 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Acura CL has automatic transmission and 1979 Fiat Ritmo has manual transmission. 1979 Fiat Ritmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Acura CL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Fiat Ritmo | 1998 Acura CL | |
| Make | Fiat | Acura |
| Model | Ritmo | CL |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1049 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 150 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4826 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1389 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2715 mm |
