1979 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,714 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1979 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1979 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 220 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade.

Because 2003 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Fiat Ritmo. (98 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Fiat Ritmo.

Compare all specifications:

1979 Fiat Ritmo 2003 MCC Crossblade
Make Fiat MCC
Model Ritmo Crossblade
Year Released 1979 2003
Engine Size 1714 cc 598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 53 HP 70 HP
Torque 98 Nm 102 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3210 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 960 kg 740 kg
Vehicle Length 3940 mm 2630 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 2460 mm 1810 mm