1979 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2008 Tata Nano
To start off, 2008 Tata Nano is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,049 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Fiat Ritmo (59 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2008 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 2008 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 264 kg more than 2008 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Fiat Ritmo (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1979 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Fiat Ritmo | 2008 Tata Nano | |
Make | Fiat | Tata |
Model | Ritmo | Nano |
Year Released | 1979 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1049 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 55.5 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2230 mm |