1979 Ford Fairlane vs. 1964 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1979 Ford Fairlane is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Ford Fairlane (124 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 900 kg more than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1979 Ford Fairlane (296 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (33 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1979 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Ford Fairlane | 1964 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Fairlane | Fronte |
Year Released | 1979 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 4093 cc | 360 cc |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 33 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2060 mm |