1979 Ford Falcon vs. 1976 Mazda 929

To start off, 1979 Ford Falcon is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Ford Falcon (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Ford Falcon weights approximately 258 kg more than 1976 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Ford Falcon (263 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 929. (137 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1979 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 929.

Compare all specifications:

1979 Ford Falcon 1976 Mazda 929
Make Ford Mazda
Model Falcon 929
Year Released 1979 1976
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3271 cc 1769 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 129 HP 83 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 263 Nm 137 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1380 kg 1122 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2520 mm