1979 Ford Granada vs. 2003 Holden UTE
To start off, 2003 Holden UTE is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Ford Granada would be higher. At 4,092 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Ford Granada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1979 Ford Granada. (96 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1979 Ford Granada.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Ford Granada. (284 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2003 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Ford Granada.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Ford Granada | 2003 Holden UTE | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Granada | UTE |
Year Released | 1979 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4092 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 284 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2950 mm |