1979 Ford Monarch vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,122 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1979 Ford Monarch is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Ford Monarch. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Ford Monarch | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Monarch | TL |
Year Released | 1979 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4122 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2840 mm |