1979 Ford Monarch vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,122 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Ford Monarch weights approximately 405 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio.
Because 1979 Ford Monarch is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Ford Monarch. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Ford Monarch | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Monarch | Clio |
Year Released | 1979 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4122 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 98 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2590 mm |