1979 Ford Monarch vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,122 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Ford Monarch weights approximately 131 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Because 1979 Ford Monarch is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Ford Monarch. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Ford Monarch | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Monarch | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4122 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2880 mm |