1979 Ford Monarch vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,122 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 695 kg more than 1979 Ford Monarch.
Because 2010 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Ford Monarch. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Ford Monarch has automatic transmission and 2010 Volvo XC90 has manual transmission. 2010 Volvo XC90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Ford Monarch will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Ford Monarch | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Monarch | XC90 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4122 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2860 mm |