1979 Ford Mustang vs. 1957 Seat 600
To start off, 1979 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1979 Ford Mustang (87 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1957 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1957 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Ford Mustang weights approximately 613 kg more than 1957 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Ford Mustang (161 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1979 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Ford Mustang | 1957 Seat 600 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Mustang | 600 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1188 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2010 mm |