1979 Ford Mustang vs. 1999 Mazda 626

To start off, 1999 Mazda 626 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda 626 (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1979 Ford Mustang. (87 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1979 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda 626 weights approximately 52 kg more than 1979 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1979 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Ford Mustang (161 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda 626. (152 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1979 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda 626.

Compare all specifications:

1979 Ford Mustang 1999 Mazda 626
Make Ford Mazda
Model Mustang 626
Year Released 1979 1999
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2294 cc 1839 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 87 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 161 Nm 152 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 96 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.5 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 8.6:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1188 kg 1240 kg
Vehicle Length 4560 mm 4680 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 2560 mm 2680 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]