1979 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Ford Mustang would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Ford Mustang weights approximately 285 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1979 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Ford Mustang | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | Clio |
Year Released | 1979 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2770 mm |