1979 Ford Taunus vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1979 Ford Taunus is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1979 Ford Taunus. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1979 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Ford Taunus weights approximately 80 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Ford Taunus. (92 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1968 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Ford Taunus.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Ford Taunus | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taunus | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1979 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1293 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 94 HP |
Torque | 92 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2210 mm |