1979 Ford Taunus vs. 2000 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Arosa is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Arosa weights approximately 359 kg more than 1979 Ford Taunus.
Because 1979 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Ford Taunus | 2000 Seat Arosa | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Taunus | Arosa |
Year Released | 1979 | 2000 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1289 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2850 mm |