1979 Holden Gemini vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 1,584 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Holden Gemini is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Smart Fortwo (71 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1979 Holden Gemini. (67 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Smart Fortwo should accelerate faster than 1979 Holden Gemini.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Smart Fortwo (125 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Holden Gemini. (110 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Smart Fortwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Holden Gemini. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1979 Holden Gemini has manual transmission. 1979 Holden Gemini will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Holden Gemini | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Holden | Smart |
Model | Gemini | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1979 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |