1979 Holden GTS vs. 2012 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2012 Subaru Outback is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Holden GTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Holden GTS would be higher. At 4,141 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Holden GTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Subaru Outback (170 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1979 Holden GTS. (158 HP @ 4550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1979 Holden GTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Subaru Outback weights approximately 80 kg more than 1979 Holden GTS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Holden GTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Holden GTS (326 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Subaru Outback. (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1979 Holden GTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Holden GTS | 2012 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Holden | Subaru |
Model | GTS | Outback |
Year Released | 1979 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4141 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4550 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 326 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1555 kg |