1979 Honda Prelude vs. 1965 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1979 Honda Prelude is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,750 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Honda Prelude is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Honda Prelude (90 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Honda Prelude should accelerate faster than 1965 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Honda Prelude weights approximately 5 kg more than 1965 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Honda Prelude (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1979 Honda Prelude will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Honda Prelude | 1965 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Honda | Riley |
Model | Prelude | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1979 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1750 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2380 mm |