1979 Kia Brisa vs. 1991 Mazda MX-3

To start off, 1991 Mazda MX-3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Kia Brisa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Kia Brisa would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Mazda MX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mazda MX-3 (88 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1979 Kia Brisa. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mazda MX-3 should accelerate faster than 1979 Kia Brisa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mazda MX-3 weights approximately 288 kg more than 1979 Kia Brisa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1979 Kia Brisa is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Kia Brisa. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Mazda MX-3 (133 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Kia Brisa. (68 Nm). This means 1991 Mazda MX-3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Kia Brisa. 1991 Mazda MX-3 has automatic transmission and 1979 Kia Brisa has manual transmission. 1979 Kia Brisa will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1991 Mazda MX-3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: