1979 Lada 1200 vs. 2000 Peugeot 607
To start off, 2000 Peugeot 607 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 2,165 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Peugeot 607 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Peugeot 607 (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1979 Lada 1200. (61 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Peugeot 607 should accelerate faster than 1979 Lada 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Peugeot 607 weights approximately 605 kg more than 1979 Lada 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Lada 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Lada 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Peugeot 607, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Peugeot 607 (315 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Lada 1200. (85 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2000 Peugeot 607 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Lada 1200. 2000 Peugeot 607 has automatic transmission and 1979 Lada 1200 has manual transmission. 1979 Lada 1200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Peugeot 607 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Lada 1200 | 2000 Peugeot 607 | |
Make | Lada | Peugeot |
Model | 1200 | 607 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 61 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 39 L | 80 L |