1979 Lada 1200 vs. 2003 Daewoo Kalos
To start off, 2003 Daewoo Kalos is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 1,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Daewoo Kalos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Daewoo Kalos (93 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1979 Lada 1200. (61 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Kalos should accelerate faster than 1979 Lada 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Daewoo Kalos weights approximately 85 kg more than 1979 Lada 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Lada 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Lada 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Daewoo Kalos (130 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Lada 1200. (85 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2003 Daewoo Kalos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Lada 1200. 2003 Daewoo Kalos has automatic transmission and 1979 Lada 1200 has manual transmission. 1979 Lada 1200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Daewoo Kalos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Lada 1200 | 2003 Daewoo Kalos | |
Make | Lada | Daewoo |
Model | 1200 | Kalos |
Year Released | 1979 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 61 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 39 L | 45 L |