1979 Lada 1200 vs. 2006 Pontiac Vibe
To start off, 2006 Pontiac Vibe is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Pontiac Vibe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Pontiac Vibe (119 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1979 Lada 1200. (61 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Pontiac Vibe should accelerate faster than 1979 Lada 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Pontiac Vibe weights approximately 312 kg more than 1979 Lada 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Pontiac Vibe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Lada 1200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Pontiac Vibe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Pontiac Vibe (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Lada 1200. (85 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Pontiac Vibe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Lada 1200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Lada 1200 | 2006 Pontiac Vibe | |
| Make | Lada | Pontiac |
| Model | 1200 | Vibe |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 61 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 156 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1257 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.3 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 39 L | 45 L |
