1979 Lada S vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Lada S would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 205 kg more than 1979 Lada S.
Because 1979 Lada S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Lada S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1992 Holden Apollo has automatic transmission and 1979 Lada S has manual transmission. 1979 Lada S will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Holden Apollo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Lada S | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Lada | Holden |
Model | S | Apollo |
Year Released | 1979 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2610 mm |