1979 Lada S vs. 2006 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Lada S would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Lada S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Lada S weights approximately 185 kg more than 2006 Smart ForFour.
Because 1979 Lada S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Lada S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Smart ForFour has automatic transmission and 1979 Lada S has manual transmission. 1979 Lada S will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Smart ForFour will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Lada S | 2006 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Lada | Smart |
Model | S | ForFour |
Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1099 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 47 L |