1979 Lancia Delta vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Lancia Delta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Lancia Delta would be higher. At 2,485 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (163 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1979 Lancia Delta. (75 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1979 Lancia Delta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 559 kg more than 1979 Lancia Delta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Lancia Delta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Lancia Delta. (105 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2002 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Lancia Delta.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Lancia Delta | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Lancia | Nissan |
Model | Delta | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1979 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1301 cc | 2485 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 55.5 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1494 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |