1979 Lincoln Continental vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 6,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (148 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1979 Lincoln Continental. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1979 Lincoln Continental.
Because 1979 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (320 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Lincoln Continental. (313 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Lincoln Continental.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Lincoln Continental | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Lincoln | Holden |
| Model | Continental | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6554 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 313 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5570 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2685 mm |
