1979 Lincoln Mark VI vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Lincoln Mark VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Lincoln Mark VI would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Lincoln Mark VI is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 103 more horse power than 1979 Lincoln Mark VI. (139 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1979 Lincoln Mark VI.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Lincoln Mark VI (359 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 1979 Lincoln Mark VI will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden UTE. 1979 Lincoln Mark VI has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2010 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Lincoln Mark VI will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Lincoln Mark VI | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Lincoln | Holden |
Model | Mark VI | UTE |
Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5733 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 359 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |