1979 Lotus Eclat vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 2,971 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 790 kg more than 1979 Lotus Eclat.
Because 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Lotus Eclat. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Lotus Eclat | 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
Model | Eclat | Pajero |
Year Released | 1979 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1973 cc | 2971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2730 mm |