1979 Maserati Khamsin vs. 1996 Mazda Sentia
To start off, 1996 Mazda Sentia is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Maserati Khamsin. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Maserati Khamsin would be higher. At 4,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Maserati Khamsin is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Maserati Khamsin weights approximately 114 kg more than 1996 Mazda Sentia.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mazda Sentia has automatic transmission and 1979 Maserati Khamsin has manual transmission. 1979 Maserati Khamsin will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mazda Sentia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Maserati Khamsin | 1996 Mazda Sentia | |
Make | Maserati | Mazda |
Model | Khamsin | Sentia |
Year Released | 1979 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Size | 4899 cc | 2954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 1566 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2860 mm |