1979 Matra-Simca Rancho vs. 1952 Renault Colorale
To start off, 1979 Matra-Simca Rancho is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Renault Colorale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Renault Colorale would be higher. At 2,383 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Renault Colorale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Matra-Simca Rancho (79 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1952 Renault Colorale. (45 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Matra-Simca Rancho should accelerate faster than 1952 Renault Colorale. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Renault Colorale weights approximately 478 kg more than 1979 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Because 1952 Renault Colorale is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Renault Colorale. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Matra-Simca Rancho, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Matra-Simca Rancho | 1952 Renault Colorale | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Renault |
| Model | Rancho | Colorale |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1441 cc | 2383 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 45 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1132 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2670 mm |
