1979 Matra-Simca Rancho vs. 1999 Nissan Z
To start off, 1999 Nissan Z is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Matra-Simca Rancho. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Matra-Simca Rancho would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan Z (197 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1979 Matra-Simca Rancho. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 1979 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Because 1999 Nissan Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Matra-Simca Rancho, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan Z (245 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Matra-Simca Rancho. (116 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Nissan Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Matra-Simca Rancho | 1999 Nissan Z | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Nissan |
Model | Rancho | Z |
Year Released | 1979 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1441 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2450 mm |