1979 Mazda 121 vs. 2003 Skoda Octavia

To start off, 2003 Skoda Octavia is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Skoda Octavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Skoda Octavia (101 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1979 Mazda 121. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Skoda Octavia should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda 121.

Because 1979 Mazda 121 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 121. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Skoda Octavia (240 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mazda 121. (160 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Skoda Octavia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mazda 121.

Compare all specifications:

1979 Mazda 121 2003 Skoda Octavia
Make Mazda Skoda
Model 121 Octavia
Year Released 1979 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1970 cc 1984 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 90 HP 101 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 160 Nm 240 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 1900 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 79.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98 mm 95.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.6:1 19.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4510 mm 4510 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2520 mm 2520 mm