1979 Mazda 323 vs. 2010 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2010 Jeep Compass is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Compass weights approximately 553 kg more than 1979 Mazda 323.
Because 1979 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Mazda 323 | 2010 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Mazda | Jeep |
| Model | 323 | Compass |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1415 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 172 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1428 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4404 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1656 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2634 mm |
