1979 Mazda 626 vs. 1965 Peugeot 204
To start off, 1979 Mazda 626 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Peugeot 204. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Peugeot 204 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mazda 626 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1965 Peugeot 204.
Because 1979 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Peugeot 204, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Mazda 626 | 1965 Peugeot 204 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 626 | 204 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1130 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 52 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2310 mm |