1979 Mazda 626 vs. 1998 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1998 Mazda Midge is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mazda 626 weights approximately 79 kg more than 1998 Mazda Midge.
Because 1979 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Mazda 626 | 1998 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 626 | Midge |
Year Released | 1979 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |