1979 Mazda 626 vs. 2006 Nissan M
To start off, 2006 Nissan M is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan M is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1979 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan M, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Nissan M has automatic transmission and 1979 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1979 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Nissan M will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Mazda 626 | 2006 Nissan M | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 626 | M |
Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 4500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1830 mm |