1979 Mazda 626 vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi TT weights approximately 455 kg more than 1979 Mazda 626.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Mazda 626 | 2010 Audi TT | |
| Make | Mazda | Audi |
| Model | 626 | TT |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4178 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1351 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2469 mm |
