1979 Mazda 626 vs. 2010 BMW X5
To start off, 2010 BMW X5 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW X5 weights approximately 1390 kg more than 1979 Mazda 626.
Because 2010 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 BMW X5 has automatic transmission and 1979 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1979 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 BMW X5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Mazda 626 | 2010 BMW X5 | |
| Make | Mazda | BMW |
| Model | 626 | X5 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 4400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 555 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 2435 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4851 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1994 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1763 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2934 mm |
