1979 Mazda 626 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1498 kg more than 1979 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban has automatic transmission and 1979 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1979 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Mazda 626 | 2010 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | 626 | Suburban |
Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 320 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 2543 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 5649 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1951 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3302 mm |